Get help now

Gun Control, Why or Why Not?

Updated November 1, 2018

Download Paper

File format: .pdf, .doc, available for editing

Gun Control, Why or Why Not? essay

Get help to write your own 100% unique essay

Get custom paper

78 writers are online and ready to chat

This essay has been submitted to us by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our writers.

Gun Control I say all guns are good guns. There are no bad guns.

I say the whole nation should be an armed nation. emailprotected This rather bold statement was made by Joseph Foss. Former Governor Joseph Foss, a former fighter pilot for the US Air Force, is the current President of the NRA, or National Rifle Association (Lacayo 16). The NRA is a special interest group known by many.

Its members are stereotyped to be a group of >truck-driving=, pompous, huntsmen. Indeed this is partially true, as 97% of all NRA members are suburban men. Because the organization is a more >Domestic Blend=, it is a surprising fact that the NRA is a powerful lobbyist organization. And skeptically viewed upon by many people (Lacayo 19). As a lobbyist organization, the NRA has a current main objective of protecting American citizens= rights, to possess and operate a firearm, form being violated by gun control laws. One of the NRA=s main weapons in this crusade is the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

The amendment=s translation in the eyes of the NRA and many American citizens, clearly protects the individual rights of all citizens to possess and operate firearms. This would easily make any and all gun control laws unconstitutional. And therefore illegal. This translation, however, is not accepted by all people.

Including the United States Government. They believe that the amendment guaranteed no right for individual citizens to possess weaponry, but merely allowed for the government to form and maintain an armed service (IE. United States Army, US. Navy). Because of the different translations of our constitution, gun control can be viewed by different people in different ways (Lacayo 20).

Some of the many gun control bans and laws wich are under constant hellfire from the NRA are those pertaining to self-defense. Under current laws, like those of Texas, require that people MUST retreat and be pursued by the intruder before any means of force could be taken upon the would-be attacker. Unfortunately, arguments of >criminal=s rights=, and >excessive force=, put to rest thoughts of a possible veto of some bans. With some effort from anti-gun control groups, such as the NRA, some of these laws have been lifted. Also, laws pertaining to self-defense and property protection have come to be passed as well.

Some laws also help to protect homeowners form civil suites made by wounded would-be attackers/intruders (Ward F3). Another example of unwanted (and unneeded) gun violence restriction laws, was the famous AK-47 crisis. Due to governmental handgun bans, the military issue AK-47 became easily accessible, due to the extended barrel, wich allowed the assault weapon to fall under more lenient gun bans. The weapon quickly became a favorite weapon of thieves and one wich created many a drive-by-shooting victim. In one such case, an AK-47 was used in the massacre of many school children.

The rifle had been attained legally. One can begin to wonder just how many of these violent crimes could have been prevented by a self-defense weapon. The attacks by the automatic assault weapon eventually led to more strict assault weapon bans (Hancock C2). Nevertheless, the percentile of assault weapons related to violent crimes has in facet decreased only a minuscule amount. Wich tends to lead experts to believe that many assault weapon related crimes were done with illegal weapons.

After all, it would be somewhat illogical of people to commit crimes wich were easily traced back to them by means of a simple background check of assault weapon owners (Hancock C2). It should be noted, that not all forms of gun control are intolerable. 73% of the 70 million gun owners in America declared that mandatory gun registration exist. 87% of the voters stated that background checks be required (Lacayo 17). One form of gun control wich was very minutely argued, was the AToys for emailprotected, incentive. The incentive allowed for $100 in toys, to be given to anyone who turns in a weapon.

It was viewed as a safe way to get guns off the street. It was, however, considered an unsuccessful action. The guns recovered were not considered to be those that were being used in violent crime (the weapons the incentive was aimed at). Only 317 weapons were recovered. I personally was surprised that >entrapment= wasn=t called on this one (Silvers C11). The past few actions were relatively unopposed by the NRA.

As they were not active attempts to restrict the individual rights of firearm possession. The acts below however, are examples of >undesired= gun control methods. In recent years, councilmen passed acts to limit weaponry. New restrictions not only allowed for the sale of personal weaponry to be sold further (in an attempt to keep firearm levels at a constant), but also to have particular weapons to be collected from homes, and removed from the city and destroyed (Spielman C1). Transportation of weaponry also came under fire.

Firearms could not be brought to gun stores or clubs, unless the weapons were disassembled and made inoperable. Any vehicle containing a weapon was immediately seized, and searched. Available to the owner again only after severe penalties were paid (Speilman C1). Some bills wich had been attempted to have been passed called for the forbiddance of sale of firearms to known gang members.

And also called for the right to search for weapons on the persons of anyone who was loitering. Through some effort of anti-gun control campaigns and petitions, the bills were vetoed (Spielman C1). Although the ban of guns and gun related items will indeed help to lower violent crime, it can also lead to an increase. If a criminal with an illegally attained firearm goes and attempts a violent crime, with the reassurance of his own health because the person he intended to injure would not be able to defend themselves…Then the crime would more likely be more violent.

By taking guns away from the people, you take away some of the defense that person has for his or her family, property, and life. Self-defense is a great cause for the purchase of a weapon. In the run-around of gun control laws between the NRA, and Mr. Brady, it begins to seem as if the issue is no longer as important as who wins. I believe that common sense should be used more in these issues, instead of statistics.

There is no parenthetical reference for this paragraph, as it is my opinion. Guns were invented hundreds of years ago. The purpose of the weapons were to allow a small man to be as powerful as a big man. They were built to protect the weak from the strong. Guns restriction merely allows the stronger to conquer the weak, as was done in the day of the sword and spear (Peterson 10). I should hope we live in a more sophisticated time.

Thank you. LIST OF WORKS CITED Ward, Mike. AProposals Give More Leeway for emailprotected Austin American- Standard 7 Mar.1995 :F3. Hancock, David. AHandgun Is Harder To Buy Than emailprotected Miami Herald 24 Jul.

1992: C2-C3. Peterson, Harold L. A History of Firearms. New York: Charles Scribner=s sons, 1961. Lacayo, Richard. AWho is the emailprotected Time-The Weekly Magazine 29 Jan.

1990: 16-24. Speilman, Fran. ACouncil Approves Tougher Gun emailprotected Chicago Sun Times 8 Jul. 1992: C1.

Silvers, Susan. ALandmark Norwalk Kids Store Offers Toys-for-Guns emailprotected Connecticut Post 30 Dec. 1993: G11. Travers, Bridget. World of Invention.

Detroit: Gale Research Inc. 1994.

Gun Control, Why or Why Not? essay

Remember. This is just a sample

You can get your custom paper from our expert writers

Get custom paper

Gun Control, Why or Why Not?. (2018, Nov 22). Retrieved from